COURSE 02, WEEK 07 - Oceans of Images

Part 1 - Introduction

1.1. Introduction to Ocean of Images

Before 1888, making photographs was difficult, requiring specialized training and cumbersome equipment. In that year, the Eastman Kodak Company introduced an inexpensive, easy-to-use, handheld camera, which promised: “You Press the Button, We Do the Rest.” With photography accessible to a much broader audience, anyone could take a picture. Since then, evolving photographic technologies have made taking and distributing pictures increasingly simple, with the result that photography has become ever more fully integrated into daily life. Now, with the proliferation of digital cameras, smart phones, and social media platforms, trillions of images are shared online each year, adding to those we encounter on television, in print publications, and in advertisements. It can seem that we are submerged in an ocean of images.

Since the 1960s, artists have been exploring both the means and the effects of our constant exposure to images and the power they have in shaping our understanding of ourselves and the world around us. Artists demonstrate that images are malleable—that their meaning is not necessarily fixed but, rather, can be determined by a great number of external factors. They are examining the methods and technologies used in making and circulating images, and the ways in which these systems affect how the images are viewed and interpreted. They consider the use and manipulation of images in advertising and the mass media, and, perhaps most importantly, analyze how our engagement with images today affects our relationships with truth and reality.

Learning Objectives

  • Examine the role of evolving photographic technologies in our past and present visual culture.

  • Discover some of the ways artists examine—and frequently disrupt—current methods of image production, presentation, and circulation.

  • Analyze how the use and manipulation of images in advertising and the mass media affects our relationships with truth and reality.


Part 5 - Review & Respond


Review…

  1. The following have contributed to the proliferation of photographic images:

    1. The Kodak Brownie Camera;

    2. The internet;

    3. Digital cameras; and

    4. Social media platforms including Facebook and Instagram.

  2. Sara Cwynar created the film Modern Art in Your Life to explore how values and social norms are constructed and reinforced through art history and the popular images we encounter in our lifetime.

  3. Thomas Ruff made the photographs for his Jpeg Series by downloading images he finds online and blowing them up to many times their original size.

  4. David Horvitz describes Mood Disorder as an artist book that shows what can happen when a copyright-free stock image is posted online.

  5. The series House Beautiful: Bringing the War Home by Martha Rosler pairs images of war and of the home interiors.

  6. Carmen Winant's work, My Birth:

    1. Contains over 2,000 found images sourced from books, pamphlets, and magazines;

    2. Is motivated by Winant's own experience of rarely seeing images of women giving birth; and

    3. Appreciates the ambiguity of the title since My Birth could refer to the moment in which she was born, or the moment in which she had her own child.

  7. The Watering Hole by Lyle Ashton Harris features images appropriated from all of these sources:

    1. Pictures of pop cultural icons;

    2. Antique ethnographic postcards with racist depictions of Black men; and

    3. Press and police photographs of Jeffrey Dahmer and his victims.

  8. Gertrude Käsebier belonged to a group of artist photographers known as the "pictorialists” whose goal was to elevate and promote the status of photography as a fine art.

  9. André Adolphe-Eugène Disdéri patented the carte de visite.

  10. Artist Edson Chagas makes posters from their photographs and makes them available for people to take and redistribute?

COURSE 02, WEEK 06 - Pictures of People

Part 1 - Introduction

1.1. Introduction to Pictures of People

On the surface, photographic portraits appear to convey the characteristics of individuals before the camera. However, portraits represent much more than their literal depictions. Many factors impact how a portrait is made and perceived. The relationship between the sitter and photographer, the location where the portrait was made, the subject’s awareness of the camera, as well as their gestures, poses, and clothing—each one of these elements affects not only the final image, but our interpretation of it.

It is no surprise that portraiture and self-portraiture have been among the most common forms of photography throughout the medium’s history. Even today, portraits remain an integral part of how we understand ourselves and others. This module will explore a variety of portraits depicting subjects both known and unknown. By studying these, we will understand how pictures of people have been used to establish identities for individuals and groups, reclaim power and agency, and document the important relationships that inform our place in the world.

Learning Objectives

  • Discover how the choices made by both photographers and subjects inform our assumptions about those depicted.

  • Compare how photographers build and record relationships with people depicted in their photographs.

  • Analyze how subjects exercise agency and perform identity in photographic portraits.


Part 5 - Review & Respond


Review…

  1. The following statements are true about Susan Meiselas’s intention for making the series Carnival Strippers:

    1. She became close with the women she was photographing and showed them contact sheets of the photographs she took of them so they could select the ones they liked;

    2. If she had owned a movie camera, she would have made Carnival Strippers as a film, instead of as a book with related audio; and

    3. She was interested in finding a way to visualize the relationships the women had with either other and with their own bodies.

  2. Details like the subject’s awareness of the camera, as well as their gestures, poses, and clothing, affect the way we interpret portraits.

  3. According to Katy Grannan, the covers of fashion magazines feature the most cruel kinds of pictures because they are dishonest, unrealistic depictions of people.

  4. Harry Callahan used his wife as a model to create images that experimented with different photographic processes and techniques, such as double exposure.

  5. Zanele Muholi choose to photograph members of the Black South African Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Intersex (LGBTI) community:

    1. To present the existence and resistance of this group through positive imagery;

    2. To create a record of the history of Black South African LGBTI individuals; and

    3. To engage in a form of visual activism.

  6. The series Cargo Cults by Stephanie Syjuco responds to which historical style of photography known as Ethnographic studio portraiture.

  7. The following statements apply to Akram Zaatari’s work, After They Got the Right to Arms. Fourteen young men posing with guns:

    1. To create this work, Zaatari examined images from the archive of a commercial photography studio where clients paid to have their portraits taken; and

    2. In making this work, Zaatari discovered that studio portraits are in part created by the people who are in them who perform imagined roles.

  8. From the 1970s through the 1990s, Rosalind Fox Solomon documented race relations and the legacy of discrimination in the American South. Neo-Nazi and white nationalist rallies in Charlottesville, Virginia inspired her to respond by compiling and publishing these photographs.

  9. The following statements best describes Deana Lawson's appreciation for photography; “She considers it the best medium for expressing issues of self-representation, the body, and questions about beauty.”

  10. To create a portrait of the people of the 20th century, August Sander created over 600 photographs of people and divided them into seven groups representing distinct subsections within German society.