Since this course focuses on artworks that were either nominated for or won The Turner Prize, the course website provided an overview of The Turner Prize, as follows:
“The Turner Prize is awarded each year to an artist who has made an outstanding contribution to art in Britain during the previous twelve months. I've chosen to concentrate on the Turner Prize because I believe that many of the art works nominated for it have important things to say about the times in which we are living. The art works that you'll encounter here are visually diverse, ranging from pickled cows to paintings made with elephant dung and glitter. Some are beautiful, some are shocking and many might appear on first sight to be very confusing. I can't predict whether you'll like all (or, indeed any) of them, but I hope that by the end of this free course you'll agree that contemporary art can be extremely thought-provoking. Taking the time to look beyond the immediate appearance of an art work to consider what the artist might be trying to say can be immensely rewarding.
The course describes how The Turner Prize, founded in 1984, has always attracted controversy, as seen by this quote by the Daily Mail:
“The Turner Prize is really the artistic equivalent of the Emperor's new clothes – incomprehensible rubbish worshipped by a narrow and increasingly out-of-touch clique.”
The course asks why the Turner Prize is often so controversial? Why is Turner Prize-related art often less than enthusiastically received?
It also notes how The Turner Prize does have its fans, as art critic Iain Gale asserted that while:
“… art prizes abound – all might learn from the Turner. It is a benchmark. If it didn't exist we would have to invent it. It stimulates debate, it engages and provokes. We need such catalysts. Love it or loathe it, the Turner has gradually put contemporary art within the public domain.”
Ultimately, The Turner Prize has always had the potential to stimulate debate, engage and provoke.